Monday, February 20, 2006

Children in the South face higher health risks

“GAINESVILLE, Fla. — Children living in the South are up to three times more likely to battle poor health and its consequences — including obesity, teen pregnancy and death — than those in all other regions of the United States, even if they receive the same medical care, a new University of Florida study reveals.“Hurricane Katrina gave the world a glimpse of the disparities in the South,” says Dr. Jeffrey Goldhagen, the study’s lead author and an associate professor of community pediatrics at the UF College of Medicine – Jacksonville. “Our research documents just how profoundly these disparities impact the health of children in the region.”The study, published recently in the journal Pediatrics, is the first to statistically relate region of residence to measures of child health, Goldhagen says.“In fact, we now believe that where a child lives may be one of the most powerful predictors of child health outcomes and disparities,” he says.” - Source

The poor health outcomes researchers documented include low birth weight, teen pregnancy, death and other problems such as mental illness, asthma, obesity, tooth decay and school performance. In the midst of this finding, last week Governor Bush proposed a $71 billion dollar spending bill that would boost spending on several fronts, but also provide nearly a half of a billion dollars in tax cuts. Currently the State of Florida is flush with a budget surplus of $3.2 billion. And in an election year, Republican legislators want to turn one week in August into a high dollar item shopping spree by suppressing state sales taxes for the first $5,000 on most items. Republicans want to lift the statewide sales tax of 6 percent on items such as computers, furniture and TVs, as well as the first $5,000 of more expensive items such as cars and boats. The tax break would begin July 31 and end Aug. 6 and would benefit individuals, not businesses. The plan already has tacit approval of House leaders. If implemented it would be the biggest single tax cut ever in Florida with an estimated saving of half of a billion dollars.

As House Democrats called the Republicans' tax cut a "gimmick," they offered a counterproposal of a $100 check to every Florida family that takes a $25,000 homestead exemption. The total cost for the Democrats' plan would be about $430-million. . The Democrats have stated that the recent growth in the tax burden has fallen hardest on homeowners, who are paying higher property taxes, mostly for public schools. Those homeowners also are struggling with ever-increasing electric bills and insurance premiums. "Think about whom in our community is under the gun right now. Who's feeling the squeeze?" said Rep. Dan Geber, D-Miami Beach. "We could give every single homeowner in the state of Florida a check from Florida for $100. ... This is the right thing to do." However, the Democratic plan is simply another imposture posing as a solution. It does nothing to solve our long-term predicaments.

I submit that before squandering excess state revenue with tax breaks, lawmakers should make sure their giveaways will serve taxpayers' long-term interests. Shouldn’t we be looking at ways to improve our future and our future generations? In a time when we are faced with low birth weight, teen pregnancy, death and other problems such as mental illness, asthma, obesity, tooth decay and school performance, wouldn’t a long term stratgedy or an attempt to solve these problems seem a more suitable conclusion to a 3.2 billion dollar surplus. The financial benefits of solving our long-term enduring problems will eminently out way any immediate tax relieve and help ensure a strong economic future for our the great state Florida.

As a home owner, I would rather see a resolve to poor school performance for example rather than receive check for a $100.00. Maybe our government is attempting to divert our attention. Maybe Gov. Jeb Bush and lawmakers are trying to cut down on the need to build new schools. Maybe the legislature thinks that universities can meet some of their short-term needs next year by increasing tuition by 5 percent, as the governor has recommended. Maybe they think we the Rabble are not paying attention to our long term problems? Or that they can throw us a bone and divert our sense of long-term vision.
I urge the Floridians who read this blog to contact our representatives in Tallahassee and demand a better solution to the budget surplus. The last thing that our state needs is a gimmick, an attempt to appease tax payers in an election cycle, rather than an attempt to solve the difficult issues which face us and our children’s generation.

4 Comments:

Blogger MDConservative said...

Van, come on. Don't you think the teen pregnancy would go down if, well, teens abstained? Or, we could pay for birth control pills for ALL teens. That would be one problem solved.

On a serious note:

In one line the quote is about how it is economic policies. Then the next paragraph.

“For the first time, disparities in race, gender, education, income and poverty are not the critical issues here,” he adds.

I don't understand which one it is. It is policy, not economic, until it is economic?

Look I am just sick of every possible chance taken to blame the problems on the government, there is something more to it when you have these down-trodden people... But half their kids are obese, and half are too thin? (Disclaimer: Figure of speech, not a statistic.)

"Researchers warn that the study evaluated children as a group, so the findings don’t apply to any single child’s risk. And overall, most American kids are quite healthy."

I don't know this study seems to bring up some serious questions, but it also has some big holes. Children are the future, but do we really want to make sure that all the irresponsible ones are rewarded?

7:54 AM  
Blogger Van said...

Byran -

You wrote:
"I don't think we should start handing out any money until after the hurricane season"

and

"If there is extra money we should be retiring bonds to reduce our interest costs"

These are great ideas, especially reducing our interest costs. But we need to let Tallahasse know this. I'm calling Frank Farkas and Jim Sebesta today.
As I mentioned in the piece, a $100 gimick is not what we need, besides, what does $100 get for you anymore? Since our economy is doing so well, let's think long term.

4:26 AM  
Blogger Van said...

MD- again, my prevailing philosophy here is that an ounce of pervention is worth a pound of cure.

It's obvious that we cannot stop all poverty, but we can do a better job of educating our kids on nutrition, rather than giving them fast food as an altenative to a healthy school lunch.

As I've said in a previous post, some parents are just lazy and ignorant. But many, this is a personal observation, have to work too much and don't have time cook for thier kids, there has to be a way to help them. It doesn't need to be big government either, but there has to be a way, don't you think?

4:31 AM  
Blogger MDConservative said...

If it isn't the Government or the parents then who? There has to be a way for a lot of things, but we cannot as people, as a society be expected to solve every dilemma before us.

Of course I want the children to have what they need, but I think it far too many ways we go about it in the wrong way.

Honestly, I don't have an answer.

7:29 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home